LEGO 42153: NASCAR Next Gen Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 HANDS ON REVIEW - Sariel's Bricks & Pets
#RLFMReview #42153 Chapters for your convenience: 00:00 START 00:43 BOX AND UNBOXING 02:14 NEW PIECES 02:32 PIECES IN NEW COLORS 02:43 PARTS LIST 02:56 SPEED BUILD 05:54 FUNCTIONS 06:33 IMPRESSIONS 09:21 FINAL NOTE \'LEGO 42153: NASCAR
Komentarze:
vtr0104: The strangest thing to me is that LEGO decided to make this in the first place. It's not just that the set is very basic, it's that NASCAR still has to use a facsimile shell of the vehicle they are based on, but with a lot of detail cut off. The lack of opening doors is present in the real cars, since the roll-cage wraps around the sides.
Also, unlike the old Touring Car racers, or the GT 2 classes in endurance racing, NASCAR has no requirements for massive down-force to help with various elevation and cornering forces on the tracks. Sure, they do have some, you can see the cars are built for ground effects and have a small lip-spoiler at the back, but that's sufficient for the type of racing they do.
So you now have the foundation vehicle as a kind of regular-looking car, with no crazy box-flare arches, no giant vents, scoops, extractors, no massive wing, no doors (or opening surfaces in general, what with the body being just cosmetic panels), barely a hint of side-mirror even compared to its stock form, that's meant to reliably go around a track for as long as possible, turning left. And you want to make it into a scaled-down toy made out of more-or-less blocky components.
When all the real car does is go forwards or backwards and occasionally steer, there's not much you can do to make it interesting as a toy. The only feature they could have attempted to replicate were maybe the spin-recovery flaps on the roof, but at this scale, I can't see how they could've made them anything other than stickers.
If anything, my only gripe with this are the terrible wheels. NASCAR had been using inset steelies on Good Year Eagles for decades, with the 5-bolt pattern, and I know for the newer cars they finally moved to spoked ones with a center-lock, but you can see in the pictures that the center-lock pin is on the same level as the edge of the wheel dish, not sticking out the side like it's a tyre-slashing implement out of Death Race. Maybe they didn't have shorter axles to use there, but it still looks weird to me......
Also, unlike the old Touring Car racers, or the GT 2 classes in endurance racing, NASCAR has no requirements for massive down-force to help with various elevation and cornering forces on the tracks. Sure, they do have some, you can see the cars are built for ground effects and have a small lip-spoiler at the back, but that's sufficient for the type of racing they do.
So you now have the foundation vehicle as a kind of regular-looking car, with no crazy box-flare arches, no giant vents, scoops, extractors, no massive wing, no doors (or opening surfaces in general, what with the body being just cosmetic panels), barely a hint of side-mirror even compared to its stock form, that's meant to reliably go around a track for as long as possible, turning left. And you want to make it into a scaled-down toy made out of more-or-less blocky components.
When all the real car does is go forwards or backwards and occasionally steer, there's not much you can do to make it interesting as a toy. The only feature they could have attempted to replicate were maybe the spin-recovery flaps on the roof, but at this scale, I can't see how they could've made them anything other than stickers.
If anything, my only gripe with this are the terrible wheels. NASCAR had been using inset steelies on Good Year Eagles for decades, with the 5-bolt pattern, and I know for the newer cars they finally moved to spoked ones with a center-lock, but you can see in the pictures that the center-lock pin is on the same level as the edge of the wheel dish, not sticking out the side like it's a tyre-slashing implement out of Death Race. Maybe they didn't have shorter axles to use there, but it still looks weird to me......
Limakxx: Looks like Mustang GT 42138. ?
Lordofdragonss: See? This is what I ment by bad technic nowadays
RoscoeWasHere: I can justify the cons by the price being lowish. Also, the fact that we get a differential again is awesome. Still, they REALLY should have stuck with that white/black/yellow color scheme, that was way better.
Unbrickme: I hope you bring back the yawning hamster for future videos. I loved it because the yawning hamster made me yawn and it was really cool to connect with the video in that way! I want the yawning hamster again!
Also unpopular opinion but I actually like this car, a lot, maybe more than the mclaren due to the more advanced drivetrain and the differential. In the mclaren it was just one wheel that was connected to the engine.
Also unpopular opinion but I actually like this car, a lot, maybe more than the mclaren due to the more advanced drivetrain and the differential. In the mclaren it was just one wheel that was connected to the engine.
Grzegorz-Brz?czyszczykiewicz & Co.: I miss the days in 1997-2017 When you could combine Functionality, Playability, and Electronics into a Decent Looking Set and it wasn’t Pricey.
Adrian Lee: Probably the most bland of the Technic sets of this price point. Sure it's quite well sealed up for the most part but it doesn't really bring anything new or interesting that we've not seen before. Maybe if it was released years earlier, it would've been OK, but unfortunately the McLaren Senna GTR and the Bugatti Bolide sets exist and are the same price like you said. Both are far more interesting and intricate to build. And I hear there's more like these coming in the Summer, supposedly a Lamborghini.
Simon Laudati: This set is really rubbish
Undead Rising: Even those other cars purposefully made to go on the Transporter had mirrors! What went wrong here? Just like the F&F Charger from a couple of years back, they didn't even bother with mirrors! That's just lazy, as it only involves a couple of extra pieces.
While I love the use of the classic crankshaft pieces in its engine, those pins being used for pistons is downright hideous... that look doesn't work at all.
While I love the use of the classic crankshaft pieces in its engine, those pins being used for pistons is downright hideous... that look doesn't work at all.
Ciuffo Arancione: One of the worst technic set ever...even chinese models are better than this "thing"...
Aurelia McCrory: I can't believe this is the follow up to the Senna and Bolide
Kornél Guba: Shut up and take my money
marco leung: Sariel! I saw Lego technic have made some breakthrough in these few years . They designed models more realistic.
Filip: I realy like hamster part, he is checking engine like "Who tf did this mess"
Studio Kostq: 42098 pt3. The Mustang was 42098 pt2.
Alfons: Your rating is overly bad on this great looking car. It's my favourite car of all 50€-cars from Lego and i love stickers because i can apply them almoust as accurate as JANGBRICKS. On the same time you rate the boring and bad looking Bad Motorcycle with almost only 4-5 stars. And where is the good old Sariel-music instead of this annoying noise? Thumbs down this time.
Pen Friends: Not sure why this kit is getting so much dislike. For the money it doesn’t seem that bad?
I mean it’s no Ford GT. but that’s double the price and a bit more
I mean it’s no Ford GT. but that’s double the price and a bit more
Singin Artist: I really like this set in my opinion, its nice to see a licensed NASCAR set by LEGO. But I can still understand all the dislikes the set gets. The engine really doesn't move a lot when driving.
_Final_: leftover pieces are always nice
Film osadzony źródło: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lvQMJE8wO9s
